You must clearly explain your grounds for appeal and provide relevant, dated, independent evidence. Appeals may not proceed if insufficient information or evidence is provided.
Appeals submitted on the grounds of extenuating circumstances are reviewed at Stage 1 by the EC Appeals Panel.
The panel will consider:
- Why you did not submit an EC claim at the appropriate time
- Evidence that you were unable to do so (for example, due to incapacity)
Acceptable reasons may include evidence that:
- You were not capable of understanding that your performance was affected by serious ill health, supported by written evidence from a psychiatrist or mental health practitioner who has treated you over time, or
- Your GP confirms relevant treatment, referrals, or an incident close to the assessment date that temporarily affected your ability to make decisions
Lack of awareness of the EC process, or failure to engage with your programme team about possible extensions, is not considered an acceptable reason.
Appeals submitted on grounds of material administrative error or regulatory or procedural irregularity or where re-registration to re-attend a module following reassessment has not been offered are reviewed Stage 1 by an independent University Award & Progression Board chair.
Examples of acceptable documentary evidence for extenuating circumstances are available on MyCumbria.
Appeals based on:
- procedural or regulatory irregularity
must be supported by verifiable evidence directly related to your claim.